Showing posts with label HUD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label HUD. Show all posts

Monday, January 9, 2017

Great News for FHA Borrowers

FHA Loans Just Became More Affordable


In a statement today, the Department of Housing and Urban Development announced that the annual mortgage insurance premium on FHA loans will drop by 25 basis points which is equal to .25% savings to any FHA borrower.  This will help ease the effect of the rising interest rates and give a little more buying power or more room in the monthly housing expense.  (The cut applies to new mortgages with a closing or disbursement date on or after Jan. 27, 2017).


“Dropping mortgage insurance premiums today will mean a whole lot more responsible borrowers are suddenly eligible to purchase a home through FHA,” William Brown, president of the National Association of Realtors, said in a statement.


The FHA said that it projects that its new premium rates will save new FHA-insured homeowners an average of $500 in 2017 alone.

So what is an FHA Loan anyways?


An FHA loan is a mortgage insured by the Federal Housing Administration. Borrowers with FHA loans pay for mortgage insurance through a Mortgage Insurance Premium (MIP), a self-sufficient insurance fund that protects the lender from a loss if the borrower defaults on the loan.  FHA loans are attractive to buyers because they require a low down payment, lower rates and more flexible guidelines.  
Please reach out to me for more information on current FHA Home Loan Rates or to find a loan program that is right for you.
Sincerely,
Chris

Monday, September 8, 2008

Sooner or Later I am Right!

Some of you may recall that 45 days ago I predicted the 30 year note to get to 6%. Then 2 weeks after that I again reiterated the stance. Well after the Fed stepped in and took over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, we have now seen the rates drop to 6% on a 30 year fixed. That is the good news, here is the bad news.

By taking over these institutions the government has put there finger in the dam. Now they are stuck there with there “finger” in the problem that is our mortgage industry. It is going to cost the tax payers BILLIONS to rescue these two giants. Compared to what we are spending in Iraq, that is a drop in the bucket, but none the less, it is Billions in dollars that could be better used to lower our debt as opposed to raise it. If the gamble pays off, and the money the government invests in Fannie and Freddie has a return, then they have made money. But when was the last time you wanted to gamble Billions of your hard earned dollars and that of your children?

A more realistic scenario is that these two entities become part of HUD in the next 4 years and lending guidelines for the next 4-8 years are slow to loosen. Regional banks and local banks will become the place creative financing, but only for those people that have excellent credit and significant assets or equity.

For questions or comments on this please contact Chris Scheer at cscheer@cornerstonestl.com or 314.223.9824.

Monday, June 16, 2008

FHA Lifts 90 Waiting Period

In a move to help get foreclosures off the books of lenders quicker and help avoid deterioration of properties that have been foreclosed upon the Department of Housing and Urban Development has lifted their ban on writing a contract if the title has changed in the past 90 days. See the following article: http://www.cnbc.com/id/25146122

For further clarification you can visit HUD’s website at http://www.hud.gov/news/release.cfm?content=pr08-082.cfm

For questions or comments please contact Chris Scheer at cscheer@cornerstonestl.com or 314.223.9824.

Friday, December 28, 2007

Customer Service or Lack There Of!

If you have read my previous posting on Manufactured Housing you may be aware of the challenge that I had getting the appraiser to put the Make, Model, serial number and year manufactured on an appraisal of a Manufactured house. The appraisal form clearly states that this information is needed, yet the appraiser we chose to use could not find the information on the property and thus felt it was not his responsibility to locate. Over a 2 week period my assistant requested the information be added to the appraisal and each time she was told he didn’t have it or have access to it. Since this was one of my first challenges working with this assistant I let her attempt to handle the situation until it became a crisis. I recognize I should have stepped in sooner, but until you see someone perform under fire you don’t know how good they are.

At the eleventh hour I went to the internet and found the source of the information within 10 minutes. Prior to doing that I sent an e-mail to the managing partner of the appraisal company that was very direct and to the point, see the following:

We have a challenge. As you are aware, we have asked the appraiser to supply the Manufacture’s serial number, name, trade/model and date manufactured for the property on Lynch road. At this time this is the only item I need to get a clear to close, however we will not close until we have it. In the appraiser’s defense, the realtor and her clients went through the entire house tonight and could not find it. However, since there is the HUD certification label #RAD730051 as per his appraisal, this should be the basis to track down the required information. If the realtor manages to find this information then the appraiser looks bad. If we manage to find this information, then the appraiser looks bad. If HUD provides it, he still looks bad, but not as bad. If he finds it, then he gets off the hook. See the challenge? I realize that this is extra work and frustrating for everyone. However we have a client who is trying to purchase a home and helping them achieve their goal is what we do.

Feel free to call me if you have any questions or comments.

I have inserted “the appraiser” and “realtor” where the names were in the correspondence. I received no reply to this e-mail from the appraiser and when I was contacted that day by the appraiser to review the value on another property nothing was mentioned of the e-mail until I brought the situation up. The defense of the appraiser was that no other lender had ever requested this information and he felt it was not his responsibility. I reiterated that the underwriter requested that the appraiser complete this section of the appraisal, therefore at that time it becomes the appraiser’s responsibility. He continued to contend that since he couldn’t find it then it wasn’t his job to get it. When I explained how easy it was for me to obtain, he asked why I didn’t do that sooner. It became a circle of discussion with me telling him what I expected as the client and him saying that he wouldn’t do it. Later that day I addressed the situation with one of the other principals at the company whom the e-mail was sent to and he defended his partner. Going further to say that we didn’t know what we were doing.

I appreciate a business partner defending his associates, but at the point that you have a client telling you that you screwed up and that what was being requested was not out of the ordinary for out industry this is not the stance to take if you want to keep the relationship. As the lender I have a choice of the appraisers I choose and the stance this company took will keep them from getting any more of my business.

For questions or comments on this post, please contact Chris Scheer at cscheer@cornerstonestl.com or 314.223.9824.

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

Manufactured Housing

So why is it so hard to get a loan for a manufactured house? Over the past month I have had the opportunity to work a loan that was on manufactured house that had been repossessed by HUD. The client came to me saying they wanted to buy this house without having sold their current home so they could have time to fix it up before moving in. The borrower was self-employed and he felt his tax returns would not support him owning 2 homes. Based upon his excellent credit I told him we had a way to do the loan if he put 10% down. We would allow him to state his income and then when he sold his current home and was ready to pay down the mortgage on the new home we would refinance him. Things were going along swimmingly until the file hit underwriting. Even though the guidelines I had for the investor said they would do a conventional loan using stated income on a manufactured home, the information the underwriter had said otherwise. At this point most loan officers would take a pass and deny the loan. I chose to switch the loan to an FHA loan and ask the borrower for the documentation to support the income needed.

When I met with the client and reviewed their tax returns I found that they did indeed have enough income for two houses. I will be the first to admit that I made the mistake of not taking charge initially and getting all the documentation upfront and being the expert. Instead I let the client lead me down a path that was a dead end. We switched the appraisal to an FHA appraisal and requested that the realtor change the contract to an FHA contract. The listing agent, being a representative for HUD said that if the loan went FHA a work escrow would be required to repair some items they had found when they did their walkthrough after repossessing the house. The work escrow seemed minimal and the client agreed to fund the work escrow themselves.

In the meantime I contacted our investors to see who would purchase an FHA loan on a manufactured home. I found one of our investors that were willing to purchase the loan and then we sent it to their underwriters. As luck would have it, they denied the loan because it had a work escrow. Now we were in a quandary, we couldn’t do an FHA loan on a HUD repo because there was a work escrow required and we couldn’t go conventional stated with the first investor because they wouldn’t do a loan on a manufactured home. So now, I am sure most loan officers would have told the clients that they could not help them. However, I realized that the realtor involved was counting on the commission from the sale and the borrowers were truly buying a great home for them to retire to. There had to be a way to get the loan done!

We then switched back to a conventional loan and found just 1 of our investors that would purchase a conventional loan on a manufactured home. This investor had some strict guidelines on the information needed on the appraisal, including the HUD Plate and the Manufactures serial number, make, model and year manufactured. In reviewing the appraisal we found that the appraiser did have the HUD Plate information but was lacking the rest of the required information. For 2 weeks we kept asking the appraiser for this information. He continually said that it was not available. The night prior to the loan closing I googled the term “HUD Plate and on the third website showing in the search I found the information for the IBTS, a company that who will get the information for you that was needed if you have the HUD Plate information; http://www.ibts.org/faq_consumer.htm. They charge a $50 fee for normal processing or for a rush they charge $75. We faxed them the form and had the information within 2 hours. We then gave the information to the appraiser for him to add to the appraisal. By 1:00 that day we were clear to close and the borrowers had their new home.

If you can tell me why a home that is manufactured but is permanently attached onto a foundation with a basement is any different than the quickly built subdivision houses that are thrown up across the country I would be happy to learn. Contact Chris Scheer at cscheer@cornerstonestl.com or 314.223.9824.

Sunday, October 28, 2007

Downpayment Assistance Rule

For the past few years, FHA has allowed charitable non-interested parties to supply the down payment to a borrower on FHA loans. Unfortunately, this practice caused housing prices to be inflated as the seller would raise their price and then contribute the increase to the charity as a donation. The charity would then give a gift to the borrower and thus have the down payment for a home with an FHA mortgage. The challenge is that the borrower had no vested interest in the house and when times got tough it was easy for them to walk away since they would be losing nothing other than a home with an inflated price. Selling the home was difficult in a flat or declining real estate market. This practice is one of the logs on the bonfire of the mortgage industry that is burning across our nation. Here is the latest on this practice:

FHA will issue official guidance regarding implementation of the regulation regarding a mortgagor’s cash investment. In the interim, to address the questions raised by many industry partners, FHA is providing the following information:

1. Nehemiah Corporation of America, due to a previous Settlement Agreement and as discussed in the rule, is granted relief from the effective date of the rule until April 1, 2008.

2. HUD has agreed to grant the AmeriDream Downpayment Assistance Program relief from the effective date of the rule until February 29, 2008.

3. All other similar downpayment assistance providers have not been granted relief from the effective date of the rule, which is October 31, 2007.

Provided that the homebuyer has entered into a contract of sale (including any amendments to purchase price) on or before October 31, 2007, FHA will recognize the gift if made to the homebuyer and properly documented as an acceptable source of the downpayment.

To read the final rule in its entirety and for more information please visit: http://hudclips.org/sub_nonhud/cgi/pdf/4846a.pdf

For questions or comments please contact Chris Scheer at cscheer@cornerstonestl.com or 314.223.9824.

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

FHA Mortgage Insurance May Change!

HUD has announced a proposal to change the cost of both upfront and monthly mortgage insurance for purchases and refinances. This change is based upon loan to value and credit score. Their reasoning is that they want to be able to serve more borrowers and keep the opportunity for home ownership accessible to as many as possible. They have imitated a rate system that has been in place in the private mortgage insurance sector for years. Depending on how good your credit is and how much you put down or how much equity you have, your cost of the mortgage insurance will go down.

Why is this good? As the secondary market continues to shy away from maximum financing i.e. 100% loans someone needs to step up to the plate to keep the ability to purchase lower priced homes feasible for most working class people. When they want and can purchase the starter home or the lower priced home, then the person selling that home has the chance to move up, which keeps the process moving right up the price scale.

You can view the proposed changes and get information on how you to can comment to HUD about this change at this address; http://hudclips.org/sub_nonhud/cgi/nph-brs.cgi?d=FR07&s1=FR-5171-N-01$[NO]&SECT5=FR07&SECT1=TXTHLB&l=50&u=../cgi/newsdoc_run.cgi&p=1&r=1&f=G

For your comments about this blog or any questions for Chris Scheer, please contact him at cscheer@cornerstonestl.com.

Saturday, September 8, 2007

What is the Delay?

Here we are, one week after the announcement by the President to try to help homeowners who are struggling, http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,295369,00.html

Yet not one investor, i.e., Chase, GMAC, Countrywide, Citi Mortgage, or any of the other major national mortgage banks is ready to start selling these loans. Who is going to step up to the plate to start rescuing homeowners? Right here in St. Louis there are over 600 properties in St. Louis City and County that are for sale from Foreclosure. That number has tripled in the last 6 months. We are at the beginning of the problem. At that rate, next March we will have over 1800 homes for sale that have been foreclosed upon.

If we are a snapshot of the country, why are the major mortgage banks dragging their feet?

Most people in the industry know that HUD will insure these loans, however until HUD gives written guidelines no one is will to stick their neck out and originate a loan that may not be insured. Meanwhile, people who are late on their mortgages continue to struggle with the situation. Most are taking the ostrich approach and burying their head in the sand hoping the problem will go away. While they do this their credit gets worse and their credit scores continue to fall. The guidelines that HUD will issue will dictate a minimum credit score, so while HUD drags their feet, scores are falling and people that should get relief won’t due to governmental and political delays.

I Challenge the top executives at the major mortgage banks to step up and use common sense. We all know about what the guidelines will be. Start originating these loans and let’s start helping people. You may end up with a few loans that can’t be insured, but how many people will be helped? How much goodwill will be created? How much will your servicing portfolios increase in value as you help stop the decline of delinquencies? So what if you end up with a few million in loans that you can’t sell. Get them to perform for a year and then refinance them out of the loan that wasn’t insurable. It will cost you less than what it will to have to foreclose!